Andrew Garnar

  • 3.2Overall Quality
  • 3.4Helpfulness
  • 3.0Clarity
  • 3.2Easiness

Number of ratings 9 Submit a correction

Close




IMPORTANT: Before your requested correction is reflected on the site, your request will need to be verified and approved by the RMP Site Moderation Team.

Date
Class
Rating
Comment
12/15/12

PHIL326

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity3

Rater Interest1

While I wouldn't underestimate his intelligence, the readings were often dry and difficult to absorb. However, there were only three papers total and he is pretty straightforward in his directions and making clear what he wants. The last paper is a long one but his feedback helps. Very easy to contact and helpful if confused.

12/11/12

PHIL355

Average Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness3

Clarity2

Rater Interest3

Garnar was previously a student of Physics, though he got his masters in Philosophy. He asks questions about physics/psychology/biology that you probably won't know or understand and class is "discussion based." Prepare to be confused, even if you do the daily reading.

5/9/11

PHIL326

Average Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest1

He's alright. If you enjoy talking about Sci-fi, space, genetics, and other stuff like that, then you should do well. I had no interest in the info, but I did end up finding it interesting. He did not waste time. Do assignments, participate, be there for quizzes. Very fair teacher.

10/20/09

PHIL326

Good Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest3

This guy is extremely easy. All you gotta do is the assignments and FOLLOW HIS DIRECTIONS and it's a very easy A.

8/27/09

Phi326

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest5

Really, no slackers allowed. The tasks he gave were not difficult, but you have to familiar with all the reading materials. If you work hard or have a good critical thinking skill, you will do very well in this class.

5/20/09

PHIL326

Poor Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest3

Reading's are boring. Class is boring. He lecture's the whole time, borderline impossible to pay attention, and I was even interested in the subject. His grading made no sense at all. He's the only teacher for the course though, and you're most likely required to take it. So sorry, just fair warning.

5/6/09

Phil326

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest2

The class was required, but isn't so bad. He makes topics relevant to most students studies. Is very detailed on what he expects for paper and will help ASAP. He grades average, but not too easily. If you go to class and complete all in class assignments and out of class assignments, you'll get an A. Should attempt to read some of each book.

11/14/08

Phil103

Average Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest2

All of the readings were long and confusing...hard to understand them the way that he wanted you too...there weren't any tests just papers and he was willing to help you if you go to see him...he also has in class assignments as part of your grade

4/25/08

Phil326

Average Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness4

Clarity2

Rater Interest1

The texts are really hard to understand, but he is a nice guy and the class is only bad because it is so late in the day otherwise its not that bad.