Liudmila Jdanova

  • 3.3Overall Quality
  • 3.5Helpfulness
  • 3.1Clarity
  • 2.9Easiness

Number of ratings 11 Submit a correction

Close




IMPORTANT: Before your requested correction is reflected on the site, your request will need to be verified and approved by the RMP Site Moderation Team.

Rate this professor
Date
Class
Rating
Comment
1/5/13

PSYC2001

Good Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest4

She is great. Lectures are really straightforward, examples are clear. And she is going along with the book which helps with studying for exams. Tests are easy if you study herlectures and read chapters.

Report this rating

1/2/13

Psyc2001

Good Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness5

Clarity4

Rater Interest3

Interesting class. Make sure to study slides and textbook! Always makes sure to answer all the questions. Makes effort to help all the students.

Report this rating

1/2/13

psyc2002

Good Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness5

Clarity4

Rater Interest3

great! I was not excited to take this course, but she explained everything well.

Report this rating

12/11/12

PSYC3102

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest1

Very hard to sit through her classes. Uses irrelevant examples & spends long time on a single concept, in the end just confusing the student. Make sure you buy textbook. You will teach self. Assignment very hard, not enough time given to complete it. Most of the class did very poorly on it. Prof/TA don't respond to emails. Exams fairly easy.

Report this rating

12/11/12

PSYCH2001

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

I dont wear my seat belt driving to school because I want to die before I can make it to this class. Be prepared to teach yourself from the textbook (be sure to buy it) and for her to never explain concepts (in lecture and slides).

Report this rating

12/3/12

psyc3102

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness3

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

The prof gives tons of examples that are irrelevant. Her classes are very hard to sit through. Asks TA for help explaiing things at times. Although she is really nice and tests were not that difficult.

Report this rating

11/29/12

psyc2001

Average Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest4

I think she's a good prof but for some reason I wasn't getting it together in that class. I recommend using the text as well.

Report this rating

11/14/12

Psyc2002

Average Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness3

Clarity2

Rater Interest1

Don't expect to have the right answers on the practice questions, and that the TA's will know more than she does. Also, if you ask a stupid question she does give you attitude. Otherwise, okay class.

Report this rating

9/27/11

psyc2002

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity4

Rater Interest5

great professor

Report this rating

8/29/11

PSYC2002

Good Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest3

Super nice and super sweet professor. Not always clear, and not the best at answering students' questions. But the class is so easy, all you have to do is memorize her slides, and do the practice problems. She even lets you make a cheat sheet for the formulas. I attended only two lectures and got an A+. Her slides are all you really need.

Report this rating

6/20/11

psych2002

Good Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest3

I took stats with Lucy. Lots of people complained about her saying the class was too hard. Stats is a hard course overall so u HAVE to study. Lucy is very helpful, make sure u study from her slides, don't study just the formulas but the theories as well. I would take another course with her

Report this rating

Rate this professor