Number of ratings 19 Submit a correction

FACsT101
He epitomizes the overall capacity of the human species to rationalize superficial ignorance towards others. At least he is an example to his psych students of the tribal mind at work, or at least gone wrong. I would be ecstatic if his position was taken by one of the many capable individuals out there priceless to our free society.
psyc
the evidence he uses in his controversial research shows he doesn't really understand genetics, he should stick to doing psychology which he is good at. but he doesn't have enough competence or understanding of science which is very specialized and outside his field of knowledge. but for psychology, he has competence there.
Psyc 350
Tends to get himself into petty arguments with his students. His ego enters the room about 10 seconds before he does.
Psych
Cutting edge research into race differences. One of the few professors not afraid to undertake ground breaking research. Much like Professor Sheehan in Physics. Great debater as well, unlike David Suzuki
all
We're talking pseudo-science here. Uses cultural methods to prove physical realities. Condemned by psychologists, sociologists, and anthropologists alike, also biologists, including the geneticists. Almost lost a job, but has tenure: hard to get him ou