Lamar Peterson at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

Lamar Peterson

  • 3.1Overall Quality
  • 3.0Helpfulness
  • 3.2Clarity
  • 3.0Easiness

Number of ratings 4 / Average Grade:  A Submit a correction

Close


  • Your correction will show after moderators approve it.


Date
Class
Rating
Comment
2/18/14

ARTS3102

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness2

Clarity2

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedA+

He spent to much time talking about big times in the art world. His version of critique was small talk and chatting up his favorites. More time spent on presenting painting skills, discussing ideas and pushing student's directions might help in working towards awesome portfolios.

1/22/14

ARTS 3102

Good Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedA+

Lamar was the best art teacher I have had at UMN. He cares about students making QUALITY artwork, instead of finishing a mediocre project to meet a deadline. I suggest him to all art students who would like to build a strong portfolio. He is also very knowledgable in the art world outside of UMN and in the community.

22784025
10/29/13

ARTS 1101

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

Grade ReceivedA

He might be better now, but he did not communicate well and was not sure what to present for beginning drawing. I suppose the politely written slams he received in the New York Times give him prestige. However the adjuncts the Art Dept let go exhibited more than the tenured staff and knew how to teach.

4/17/13

ART2101

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness4

Clarity5

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

He's ok. He acted like a tough guy in class and set the tone for the class as boring. No one ever talked in class because of the way he presented everything. Critiques were great in this class though. The way he does them as opposed to many other teachers is a lot better. Attendance is mandatory which is annoying. We're not 5.

21555952

More Fine Arts professors at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

NAME
TOTAL RATINGS
OVERALL QUALITY
HELPFULNESS
CLARITY
EASINESS
HOT?
Good Quality
26
3.7
3.6
3.9
2.7
Not Hot
Average Quality
21
2.8
3.0
2.5
1.4
Not Hot
Poor Quality
13
1.4
1.3
1.5
2.5
Not Hot
See full department list