Charles Riedesel at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Charles Riedesel

  • 3.0Overall Quality
  • 3.4Helpfulness
  • 2.6Clarity
  • 1.8Easiness

Number of ratings 12 / Average Grade:  B+ Submit a correction

Close


  • Your correction will show after moderators approve it.


Date
Class
Rating
Comment
12/16/13

CSCE 155N

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity2

Rater Interest1

Grade ReceivedN/A

I had no programming experience coming into this. You will learn almost nothing in lecture but that't the class not the professor. Riedesel's major advantage is that he is incredibly helpful and available at all hours it seems. If you have to take this class take it with him. It's not gonna be fun, but he's your best option.

8/10/12

CSCE155N

Good Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness5

Clarity4

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

If you really want to learn the subject, take Chuck's class, however it is not easy. Probably the most intensive course I've ever taken, one should expect to devote a LOT of time to a course he is teaching.

3/28/11

csce150

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness2

Clarity2

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

Pretty much awful. Gave outrageous assignments and was a poor lecturer. Didn't learn a thing from him. Was useful to talk with him one on one.

12/18/10

CSCE150A

Good Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Dr Riedesel is an awesome professor. I have prior programming experience, hence why I chose a computer science major so the coding aspect wasn't terribly hard for me, however Dr Riedesel always made class enjoyable and always did a great job explaining materials. Furthermore, he has a seemingly endless funny riddles and puns.

10/21/10

CSCE150

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness2

Clarity1

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

Terribly hard class. If you want to go spend 5 hours in the computer lab and get nothing done because nobody in the class understands the information, then it would be good for you...haha

3/5/10

CSCE150E

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness2

Clarity2

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

Terrible organization. Spent the first two weeks going over the syllabus, and didn't update the webpage till about 2 months into class. Lecture's have no structure, he just spends the whole time demonstrating random programs he has made, then the assignments and exams expect you to know things you haven't been taught. GPA killer, avoid if possible.

1/12/09

CSCE428

Good Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness5

Clarity3

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

Difficult, but very helpful.

3/11/08

CSCE230

Average Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

230 is hard and almost impossible to understand by itself. Chuck does go off on a few tangents and his tests and homework assignments are impossible. The most important this is put in the effort. Chuck grades people on a personal level. He is a fun teacher and my classmates and I miss him now that we are in upper level classes.

1/14/08

CSE105

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

Should not be teaching a course. Completely unorganized. Miserable course.

6/7/07

CSCE230

Good Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness5

Clarity4

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

This guy is either a genius or a madman. I really loved CSE230 but whimps need not apply. The homeworks were challenging but fun and the tests were impossibly hard. The key is: don't panic!

9/22/05

230

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness3

Clarity1

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

He has a tough time forming a sentence with a full thought in it. He gets lost on tangents often. His tests are IMPOSSIBLE to study for, so you might as well give up now.

2/13/04

CSE 230

Average Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest 

Grade ReceivedN/A

No Comments

More Computer Science professors at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

NAME
TOTAL RATINGS
OVERALL QUALITY
HELPFULNESS
CLARITY
EASINESS
HOT?
Poor Quality
12
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.7
Not Hot
Poor Quality
8
1.6
1.9
1.4
2.9
Not Hot
Good Quality
7
4.4
4.9
3.9
1.4
Hot
See full department list