Neil Alberding

Neil Alberding
  • 3.2Overall Quality
  • 3.3Helpfulness
  • 3.1Clarity
  • 3.4Easiness

Number of ratings 88 Submit a correction

Close




IMPORTANT: Before your requested correction is reflected on the site, your request will need to be verified and approved by the RMP Site Moderation Team.

Date
Class
Rating
Comment
3/8/13

PHYS 120

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest4

the online smartphysics prelecs are just bleh...and all he does in class is a couple of I clicker questions. His exams are waaaaayyy harder than what you'd expect from the smartphysics homework and he doesn't really do anything to prepare you for midterms -,- do NOT take PHYS with him.

2/1/13

Phys141

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness2

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

LOADS and LOAAADS of Homework/Assignment...etc etc.......Speaks for half hr..and then disappears leaving T.A behind. SmartPhysics is horrible......watch videos aint gonna help a percent.....for such a HARD HARD Course....I wrote stuff in exam.....just passed with C-....... So relieved...Smartphysics thing is over.

1/17/13

PHYSD100

Average Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest3

I think a lot of people attribute the falters of the class's parameters to Neil (e.g. the suckyness of smartPhysics and quantity of homework). I found him to be quite average in teaching effectiveness. He had a hard time with explaining some things, but this was countered by his earnestness.

8/14/12

phys141

Poor Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness3

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

You don't understand even a single word from his lectures.

5/1/12

PHYS102

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest2

If you have him for studio physics, drop the course and take it elsewhere. The experiments were useless and the self directed learning did nothing but muddle everyone in the class. Help was available, but but not useful, and his exams were far harder than anything we encountered in class. Do not take his class.

11/21/11

Phys140

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

Horrible prof does not even bother teaching just sits there and looks at stuff on google plus leaves the entitre course to the students alongwith a ton of homework daily. Whatever you do NEVER take a class with him.

7/20/11

PHYS140

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness2

Clarity2

Rater Interest1

PLEASE do not take physics with this prof, especially if you're first year. i was not a physics major and found this class *excruciating*. bad lectures, useless help (although it is available) and tons of homework. self-directed class. drop if you have him!

7/20/11

PHYS140

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest4

if you plan on being a physics major, you might make it through this class. if you're taking it to fufill a lower division pre-req for a diff degree, DONT TAKE THIS WITH HIM. espec. if you're first year. exams ARE fair but you must keep up with homework (there's a lot!) lectures are horrible. hard to pay attention if you don't love physics.

6/14/11

PHYS100

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

One of the best profs at SFU!

12/4/10

PHYS121

Poor Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest4

Horrible Prof, has no idea what's going on, wastes time, doesn't teach the slides, just tells you to read them at home, when asked a question, he generally doesn't know the answer, so he replies with some off-topic thing, or asks you a question.

11/18/10

phys100

Poor Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

This professor is one of the worst instructors at SFU. I have a degree in Business and was coming back to school to complete med school pre-reqs and this guy is without a doubt the worst prof I've ever had. I ended up dropping the course. After seeing the comments from last semester, I'm really glad I did. Avoid him at all costs, he doesn't teach.

11/6/10

PHYS100

Good Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness4

Clarity3

Rater Interest5

Great prof and he is funny. Intersting class,and the content is not very hard. Eassy to follow. Exams are fair, but with too many quizs. or maybe a bit too much hw. I like the way he teachs

10/8/10

PHYS100

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest1

Terrible prof, we learnt almost nothing in class yet the assignments and final were so hard

9/10/10

PHYS100

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

Worst professor ever, avoid at all costs! You will not get your money's worth from this guy.

8/21/10

PHYS100

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

Jungic? I think the guy below means Alberding. Anyways, everything else I completely agree: WORST PROFESSOR EVER!

8/21/10

PHYS100

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

Whoever gave this guy 100% is completely inaccurate (I won't be surprise if Alberding wrote that evaluation himself). Final exam average was 55% this semester! 55% for a 100-level course. Alberding is a horrible lecturer who doesn't teach. ENOUGH SAID.

8/21/10

PHYS100

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest2

Sorry, but I have to disagree with the evaluation below - Dr. Jungic is a poor lecturer who doesn't teach and everything you learn is self-taught. Worst prof I ever had PERIOD.

8/17/10

phys100

Good Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

The assignments and labs are quite easy. Lectures are so so. Anyway, Neil is a good lecturer.

8/10/10

PHYS100

Poor Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

Worst. Prof. EVER. Will not teach you a thing, but will demonstrate friction by making you watch an asian guy pull a truck with his ear. Or watch Romeo and Juliet physics jokes. Did not learn a thing, except ears are strong

8/8/10

PHYS100

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

Absolutely horrendous teaching. Do not take Phys 100 with this prof you will absolutely regret it.