Mark Seeman at Kent State University

Mark Seeman

  • 2.6Overall Quality
  • 2.4Helpfulness
  • 2.7Clarity
  • 2.7Easiness

Number of ratings 17 / Average Grade:  N/A Submit a correction

Close


  • Your correction will show after moderators approve it.


Date
Class
Rating
Comment
2/12/13

ath500

Good Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

He was a professor then an advisor and a friend. Knew his calling when he was 20. Great speaker, likes what he likes and knows it well. If you didn'thave him - ya missed out!

11/5/10

ARCH001

Average Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness2

Clarity3

Rater Interest1

Grade ReceivedN/A

I guess I expected something else from this class, but the class does require you to study and put your all into the class, which isn't worth it if you really have no interest in archeological findings and what tools were used by the first humans. If it's right up your field of interest take it....if not then don't bother jeopardizing your GPA.

5/12/10

ANTH1842

Average Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness2

Clarity3

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

I dont know what is up with you people.I thought he was a very nice prof.I was really excited about this class and I thought he did a really good job teaching it.He really knows what he is talking about.The book was helpful in studying for tests.Homework assigns were a little difficult but he lets you work in groups.It's college people, grow up!

12/17/09

AnthIntr

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

Terrible. AVOID!

11/30/09

ANTH002

Poor Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness1

Clarity3

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

Pretty hard for an introduction class. You must study for all three exams to do well on them and the homework projects take a pretty long time. The TA was awesome, email him any questions. All Dr. Seeman does is read off the powerpoint.

11/27/09

INTROARCH

Poor Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

He's a phony. He tries to act like a snob, and maybe he thinks he is better just because he has a Ph.D, but having a degree doesn't mean you are better than anyone. He flaunts, trying to act superior. So, yes. He's a jerk. He talks too much about his life, his interest in wine, and his love of Guinness trying to be funny.

10/16/09

Anth101

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest1

Grade ReceivedN/A

I have no comments.

7/15/09

IntroArch

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness2

Clarity2

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

Quirky sense of humor, some material was interesting, but most lectures were pretty dry. Tests and quizzes were pretty hard, and the one homework assignment was graded really harshly (by the TA). Seemed kinda lazy, and I didn't even open the textbook. He definitely knows what he's talking about, just some communication problems, I think.

5/20/09

IntroArch

Average Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

Not a bad class, a little boring at times but if you actually try to pay attention it can be pretty interesting. Takes attendance but let's you skip 5 classes before taking points off. Only complaints would be the way he grades...it's terribly confusing and the one homework assignment we got was quite unclear as to what we were supposed to do...

2/28/08

ANTH300

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

AVOID! Seeman is tough on grading regardless of if your project is good or not. Seriously, this guy has it out for students for some reason.

7/13/07

ANTH001

Good Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness4

Clarity3

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

Dr. Seeman is quirky but very knowledgeable about his class. He has great stories that help you remember the material. His power points aren't always helpful so you have to pay attention to what he is lecturing. The material can be a little dry but the extra credits and tests are very reasonable as long as you go to class.

1/18/06

Prehistory Ohio

Good Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness4

Clarity3

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Dr. Seeman is a nice guy, but it seems as though he has trouble communicating with the class. The lectures were interesting, but it was confusing as to what was necessary for the test. The quizes were crazy we had very little time to look at the material and a fraction of a second to take the quiz. Hopefully he'll take some of the advice we gave

11/2/05

Archaeology

Poor Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness1

Clarity1

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Boring beyond belief. Arrogant, snotty and superior attitude. Thinks he's better than you and he shows it!

9/10/05

Several

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness4

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Very intelligent, and easy to get along with professor. He is always willing to answer questions and offer guidance.

9/1/05

archeology intr

Average Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness3

Clarity2

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

i'm sure the subject is fascinating.............but he needs more energy and something a bit more than lectures....but it's only a little bit into the year....so we'll see

8/30/05

Arch. Analysis

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

No Comments

7/31/04

archaeolog

Poor Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness2

Clarity2

Rater Interest 

Grade ReceivedN/A

just print the lectures off the net. i skipped a lot and still got an A. However, very unclear on assignments; i had no idea why i got what i did on them and had to ask for clarification from the TA before attempting to do them. nice, but not very helpful

More Anthropology professors at Kent State University

NAME
TOTAL RATINGS
OVERALL QUALITY
HELPFULNESS
CLARITY
EASINESS
HOT?
Average Quality
32
3.4
3.2
3.6
3.2
Not Hot
Average Quality
30
3.2
3.3
3.0
2.7
Not Hot
Good Quality
25
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.0
Hot
See full department list