Mehmet Zeytinoglu at Ryerson University

Mehmet Zeytinoglu

  • 4.1Overall Quality
  • 3.8Helpfulness
  • 4.3Clarity
  • 2.4Easiness

Number of ratings 18 / Average Grade:  C Submit a correction

Close


  • Your correction will show after moderators approve it.


Date
Class
Rating
Comment
6/30/14

ele792

Good Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

I totally love that man! He cares very much about his students and he actually wants them to learn. DSP is a very hard course but he tries his best to deliver all the information in a simplified way. That been said, his exams are brutal and nothing like the practice exams

2/3/14

ELE 532

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedB

LIL Z THE BASED PROF: HELPS OUT IN LABS, HELPS OUT ALL STUDENTS, WORKS TO BE THOROUGH, TRIES TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE UNDERSTAND THE COURSE MATERIAL. A++++ PROF

5/2/13

ELE 635

Good Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

He's a knowledgeable professor with good lecture notes. His tests were not bad, but he makes unreasonable decisions when it comes to scheduling. He scheduled the midterm for ELE635 two days after the midterm for ELE632 (another course he taught in the same semester), and he did the exact same thing with the exams.

4/22/13

ELE632

Good Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

This guy is extremely tough. Midterms are normally a 50% to a failing average. On the other hand he teaches well and speaks clear.

7/28/11

ELE635

Average Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness2

Clarity4

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

hard marking and hard final exam/mid-term paper setting, no bell curve up! Ryerson University like him and still keeping him! If you do not trust me, compare the ELE635 Class averg with other prof's class and this guy's class averg! why many student fail on this guy's class! Would Ryerson ask him or look in to this? NO! Y? Ryerson care only $$$$$$$

4/6/08

CN8814

Good Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest1

Grade ReceivedN/A

he's one of good assest in ryerson who speak flasless english and teach hardest subject with pure clarity that tough concpet easily understood in his class.very discipline and origanized.and mandatory to attend his class and whatever he's trying to explain it should come in exam.and read daily his given notes like bible.

12/1/07

ELE792

Average Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness1

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

On of the best profs at Ryerson. He is intelligent, knows his stuff and is very helpful. He teaches the courses really well. But the course is tough! so be prepared!

6/1/07

ele792

Average Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

the purpose he teaches is to show how smart he is by making a easy course hard. He doesn't really understand DSP at all.

5/31/06

ELE792

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

He knows his stuff and if you want to know what he knows you'd better to get DSP and work for it.

1/3/06

DSP

Good Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness4

Clarity5

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

He really knows his stuff. The only problem is that he expects everyone to be as smart as he is. I almost failed DSP got rid with D-

12/26/05

ELE 792 (DSP)

Good Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness4

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Pros: The guy knows his material very well and his notes are solid. Presents his lectures in an organized fashion and will help you (only if he knows that you work hard). Cons: Very tough marker and writes too fast in his lectures. You'll have a hard time keeping up. Course load is too much. Conclusion: Don't take DSP unless you absolutely need it.

3/3/05

EE8105-ELE-792

Poor Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness2

Clarity2

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

Failed all grad students on the term proj! Unclear expectations for an easy course (at the grad level). Stup!d marker. Avoid him for any graduate course, he is not even a good researcher (check his resume and his '97 filter design sw! Very arrogant and selfish.

12/21/04

ele635

Average Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest1

Grade ReceivedN/A

he is a person with very cold heart and nasty tune that enjoys watching student fail.

11/20/04

ELE792

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

Wonderful Professor!!...Always willing to help and shows students a lot of respect.Very methodical and organized. What RyeEng needs is more people like him on it's faculty. I was lucky and previliged to be in his class.Thx for everything prof!!

11/5/04

ELE792/635

Good Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness4

Clarity5

Rater Interest3

Grade ReceivedN/A

Tough guy but very effective ... one of the few teachers that can speak flawless english .. he really knows his tough .. he teaches the toughest courses in undergrad so that makes him highly unpopular among students.. but to be fair, this guy is an asset to ryerson ..

9/14/04

ELE792

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Excellent Prof .. one of the best in Ryerson .. Clearly explains the course material and the exams and midterms are very similar to the stuff he teaches in class.. Excellent overall

8/10/04

ELE792/635

Good Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest 

Grade ReceivedN/A

Complete Dick; I dont know whats his problem. Maybe in Turkey they did something to him. However hes fair to all the students regardless of 4.33gpa or 1.5gpa -- that quality i have not seen. Good Teacher.

8/7/04

ELE635/792

Good Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness4

Clarity3

Rater Interest 

Grade ReceivedN/A

HE FAILED 78% OF THE ELE635 (2003) CLASS ON THE FINAL EXAM. HORRIBLE MARKER!! THE MIDTERM AVERAGE OF ELE792 ON YEAR 2004 WAS 48%. THE MIDTERM AVERAGE OF THE POST GRAD STUDENTS WAS BARELY ABOVE 50%. SEVERAL STUDENTS FAILED FOR LESS THAN 2%.(HONESTLY)

More Engineering professors at Ryerson University

NAME
TOTAL RATINGS
OVERALL QUALITY
HELPFULNESS
CLARITY
EASINESS
HOT?
Average Quality
49
2.9
2.5
3.3
2.0
Not Hot
Good Quality
48
3.5
3.5
3.6
2.8
Not Hot
Good Quality
47
4.4
4.2
4.7
3.1
Hot
See full department list