| Date | Class | E | H | C | RI | User Comments |  Professors add your rebuttal here |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/8/06 | PSY361 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
|
|
HE'S FUNNY, BUT NOT A GOOD LECTURER, YOU HAVE TO COME TO CLASS! THIS IS A MUST, IF YOU DON'T THEN YOU WILL MISS STUFF IN THE EXAM. HIS LECTURES ARE UNDESTANDABLE AND THE SUBJECT IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN I THOUGHT. IT DOES SEEM LIKE HE IS A BIT DETACHED, BUT SO AM I, SO THERE IS NO CRITICISM IN THAT. DOESN'T CARE OF OTHERS OPINIONS THOUGH. | |
| 10/31/05 | Child Deve lopme |
4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | |
|
A very scientific approach that can become boring at times. He has much more passion for the numbers than the practical application of the studies. Overall he is friendly, but seems a bit removed from the classroom experience. | ||
| 10/4/05 | Child Dev | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |
 |
I would look for someone else to take THIS class with. He is not very organized and rambles. Does not really care for questions that challenge concepts, especially regarding intelligence. He promotes race based theories of intelligence and will not consider alternate theories. I don't know if he has kids, but he doesn't come off as someone who has had personal experience with children. Most of the information on the exams was from the book. In fact, you don't even need him for this class. | ||
| 10/4/05 | Human Soci obio |
3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | |
|
Absolutely Fascinating Class. He is not very organized and rambles. Does not really care for questions that challenge concepts, especially his own. You MUST go to lectures, since he includes information from his own research and theories not included in the book. This information WILL be in exams. | ||
| 8/31/05 | Child Dev. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
|
No Comments | ||
Copyright © 2009 RateMyProfessors.com, LLC.
Powered by 
and
