Brian Fick at Michigan Technological University

Brian Fick

  • 3.3Overall Quality
  • 3.1Helpfulness
  • 3.6Clarity
  • 3.2Easiness

Number of ratings 12 / Average Grade:  N/A Submit a correction

Close


  • Your correction will show after moderators approve it.


Date
Class
Rating
Comment
7/7/12

PH2100

Average Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

Maybe it's just me, or maybe it's just Fisher 135, but I could not pay attention to his lecture. Very monotone and did not know how to use the lecture hall equipment. Not his fault though. Follow the lectures, do the work and get help if you need it. Also, do the extra credits! There is a lot of extra credit that is VERY helpful and VERY easy.

4/20/12

PH2100

Good Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness3

Clarity5

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

A pretty good teacher. Very easy to understand and you can get an easy A if you pay attention in class and study the PowerPoints. No complaints, although sometimes it seemed like he didn't really know what he was teaching. Good other than that!

8/26/11

PH2100

Average Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness3

Clarity3

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

Definitely shouldn't be anyone's first choice for the class. He basically reads powerpoint slides that were made by another professor without feeling the need to really go into detail on the information presented. Avoid him if you can.

3/23/11

PH2100

Good Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Awesome teacher, explains everything well, he keeps it "young" and "hip"

18305506
11/6/10

PH2100

Average Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness2

Clarity3

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

If you have any other options take advantage of them! He do not explain anything; he just reads off slides showing you how to do problems. Not the greatest

7/7/10

PH2100

Poor Quality

Easiness2

Helpfulness1

Clarity2

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

Flat out the worst professor I've ever had. Tries to do examples using powerpoint, and powerpoint is all he uses. He is simply not good at teaching.

5/24/10

PH2100

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness4

Clarity4

Rater Interest4

Grade ReceivedN/A

Not a bad professor, though it is hard to pay attention in his class at some times. Was a little boring at times, some more interesting real world examples in the lectures would have been helpful maybe.

4/6/10

CCDDOB

Poor Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness1

Clarity3

Rater Interest2

Grade ReceivedN/A

Yeah, okay, he does alot of experients...but he doesn't know how to TEACH the subject. He's used to his 4000 lvl students, he doesn't know how to teach the 2100 course. I studied for over 10 hours and still did horrible on the test .I have never failed a class, and I might this semester. Very Bad Teacher and very boring lectures.

3/29/10

PH1200

Poor Quality

Easiness1

Helpfulness2

Clarity2

Rater Interest1

Grade ReceivedN/A

Hard for him to keep audience attention, doesn't get the topics across well to the class very soft-spoken, boring, too many mistakes on multiple lectures, especially during problem solving sessions.

4/21/09

PH2300

Good Quality

Easiness5

Helpfulness3

Clarity4

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Knows the topics, but has a hard time getting the ideas across during class. Uses experiments and examples to prove the point, but sometimes the substance just isn't there. Also, very easy to get off topic. He does high level particle physics, so this class is a snore for him.

4/10/06

PH4610

Good Quality

Easiness3

Helpfulness5

Clarity5

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Very good professor. Always excited about teaching the material. Fair grader.

6/27/05

PH4620

Good Quality

Easiness4

Helpfulness5

Clarity4

Rater Interest5

Grade ReceivedN/A

Great teacher! Has lots of fun with the class and is almost always available in his office for questions or just to chat.

More Physics professors at Michigan Technological University

NAME
TOTAL RATINGS
OVERALL QUALITY
HELPFULNESS
CLARITY
EASINESS
HOT?
Good Quality
98
3.9
3.5
4.3
3.0
Not Hot
Good Quality
32
4.8
4.9
4.7
3.0
Hot
Good Quality
28
4.6
4.5
4.7
3.2
Not Hot
See full department list