
| Date | Class | E | H | C | RI | User Comments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/29/09 | PSC122 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | After having taken a few other Political Science courses at Wabash, I would have to say that Professor Hollander is the liveliest one. At times lectures become a little confusing because his humor takes him off task sometimes. There aren't many assignments, so if you don't do well on one of them it is hard to make it up. Less coverage more depth. | ||||
| 11/28/09 | PSC122 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | I think he is a very good teacher that keeps his classes very interesting with his powerpoints and opinions on things. It takes a little while to get used to his style of testing, but once you have it down you should be fine. Overall, its a engaging class that you will really be able to get things out of. | ||||
| 11/18/09 | pscbaba | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | A decent prof. Explains things pretty well even though there's an obvious liberal bias that is expressed frequently. If you manage to ignore that then you should be able to get something out of his class. Grades kind of strictly but everything is covered in class or in the reading. So just do the work and you're fine | ||||
| 11/18/09 | PSCAAA | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | Overall I thought he was a pretty good teacher. I totally understood the concepts thoroughly, despite my grade. Which brings up the only real flaw in his teaching, which was his grading. It seemed to get full marks you had to be unnecessarily details, and if you had the core idea and went into detail, it wasn't always (or rarely) enough. | ||||
| 9/14/09 | PSC122 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | He is probably the worst professor I've had at Wabash College. He clearly strongly favors people in class. I don't like to have to kiss ass to have a chance in a class. My work should be able to be enough. He also uses eratic grading tactics, that aren't necessarily accurate to if the material was actually learned. | ||||
Click page numbers to read more comments.